Jeff Goldblum's surprising turn towards vegetarianism has a fascinating story behind it—one that begins with his latest role and might make you reconsider your own eating habits. But here’s where it gets interesting: Goldblum revealed that after portraying the Wizard of Oz in Jon M. Chu’s highly anticipated sequel, "Wicked: For Good," he made a significant lifestyle change. This move was driven not just by artistic pursuit, but by a deeper conviction related to the film’s powerful themes.
In a recent interview on "This Morning," Goldblum reflected on how fortunate he feels at 73 to be playing such impactful roles. He shared that working on "Wicked" has been a transformative experience—so much so that it influenced his personal choices. Specifically, discussions about the cruelty animals face prompted him to stop consuming meat and poultry entirely.
"It's a rare opportunity to take on roles that keep growing in relevance and depth over time," Goldblum said, emphasizing the privilege of collaborating with director Jon Chu. He expressed that this experience has changed him profoundly, highlighting his commitment to making a difference: "We need the world to work for everyone on Earth, including the creatures we share it with."
Following his portrayal of the villainous Wizard of Oz in the 2024 film, Goldblum is set to reprise his role in the upcoming "Wicked: For Good," scheduled for release on November 21. This highly anticipated installment features a star-studded cast, including Ariana Grande as Glinda, Cynthia Erivo as Elphaba, and Michelle Yeoh as Madame Morrible.
The original "Wicked" film garnered critical acclaim, earning ten nominations at last year's Academy Awards. It notably secured awards for costume design and production design—testament to its artistic excellence.
Expectations are high for "Wicked: For Good," which is anticipated to repeat the original film’s impressive Oscar nods, especially in major categories like Best Actress for Cynthia Erivo and Best Supporting Actress for Ariana Grande. If both receive nominations again, they will join a select group—becoming only the seventh and eighth performers in Oscar history to be nominated twice for the same role. This cements the film’s significance and the rising star power of its lead performances.
And this is the part most people miss: Such achievements often spark debate about award nominations and the significance of repeating roles on the Oscars stage. Do you think actors should be recognized multiple times for the same performance? Or should the Academy favor new performances over repeated nominations? Share your thoughts below—we're curious to hear your opinions!
